Abstract
The clinical case demonstrates inconsistencies between the results of thromboelastography and conventional coagulation lab tests at the early postoperative period of patient undergoing cardiosurgery. The analyzing of the revealed discrepancy proves that the opposition of laboratory methods as 'one against the other' for studying the hemostatic system is unacceptable.
Key words: hemostasis, conventional tests, thromboelastography.
For citation:Roitman E.V. The inconsistencies between conventional and global lab tests in cardiosurgeric patient (a clinical case). Clinical reiew for general practice. 2020; 1: 68–70. DOI: 10.47407/kr2020.1.1.00010
All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
