Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2022 > Vol 3, №1 (2022) > Characteristic features of the course of herpesvirus infections during pregnancy

Characteristic features of the course of herpesvirus infections during pregnancy

Madina I. Agaeva , Zoya A. Agaeva

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Herpesvirus infections are widespread all over the world. According to literature, more than 90% of human population are infected with one or more herpes viruses. Evidence has been published that the lytic forms of Epstein–Barr virus infection (EBV) are the threatening factor for miscarriage, preterm delivery and intrauterine infection. Epstein–Barr virus infection holds a prominent position in the structure of intrauterine infections (about 50%). It is capable of causing various types of damage in the fetus and neonate (damage to the nervous system and organs of vision, recurrent chronic septicemia, hepatopathy and respiratory distress syndrome), and could cause chronic fatigue syndrome, persistent low grade fever, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly later in the child's life. EBV infection or reactivation during pregnancy affects not only the course and outcome of pregnancy, but also the psychological condition of the pregnant woman. The literature describes the common association of the EBV active forms with maternal depressive symptoms in pregnancy and early postnatal period. EBV reactivation most often occurs in the first or second trimester. Treatment of the EBV active forms requires a comprehensive approach, which includes etiotropic, pathogenetic, immunomodulatory, and symptomatic therapy. Generally, pathogenetic therapy, immunotherapy, and symptomatic therapy are provided during pregnancy. Etiotropic therapy is extremely rare since none of the antiviral drugs are licensed for use in pregnancy.
Key words: pregnancy, herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus, intrauterine infection, diagnosis.

About the Author

Madina I. Agaeva 1 , Zoya A. Agaeva 2

1 Medsi Group of Companies JSC, Moscow, Russia;

2 Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Исаков В.А., Архипова Е.И., Исаков Д.В. Герпесвирусные инфекции человека. Санкт-Петербург: СпецЛит, 2013.
[Isakov V.A., Arkhipova E.I., Isakov D.V. Gerpesvirusnye infektsii cheloveka. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit, 2013 (in Russian).]
2. Азова М.М., Гигани О.Б. Роль вируса Эпштейна–Барр в возникновении и развитии опухолевых заболеваний. Естествознание и гуманизм. 2006; 3 (3). [Azova M.M., Gigani O.B. Rol' virusa Epshteina–Barr v vozniknovenii i razvitii opukholevykh zabolevanii. Estestvoznanie i gumanizm. 2006; 3 (3) (in Russian).]
3. Исаков В.А., Рыбалкин С.Б., Романцов М.Г. Герпесвирусная инфекция: Рекомендации для врачей. Санкт-Петербург, 2006.
[Isakov V.A., Rybalkin S.B., Romantsov M.G. Gerpesvirusnaia infektsiia: Rekomendatsii dlia vrachei. Saint Petersburg, 2006 (in Russian).]
4. Лобзин Ю.В. Руководство и атлас по инфекционным и паразитарным болезням человека. Под ред. Ю.В. Лобзина, С.С. Козлова. Санкт-Петербург: Феникс, 2008.
[Lobzin Iu.V. Rukovodstvo i atlas po infektsionnym i parazitarnym bolezniam cheloveka. Pod red. Iu.V. Lobzina, S.S. Kozlova. Saint Petersburg: Feniks, 2008 (in Russian).]
5. Алексеев А.В. Полиморфизм проявлений Эпштейна–Барр вирусной инфекции в практике врача дерматовенеролога. Дніпровський медичний часопис. 2009; 1 ( 4): 15–9.
[Alekseev A.V. Polimorfizm proiavlenii Epshteina–Barr virusnoi infektsii v praktike vracha dermatovenerologa. Dnіprovs'kii medichnii chasopis. 2009; 1 ( 4): 15–9 (in Russian).]
6. Carville A, Mansfield KG. Comparative pathobiology of macaque lymphocryptoviruses. Comp Med 2008; 58 (1): 57–67.
7. Малашенкова И.К., Дидковский Н.А., Сарсания Ж.Ш. и др. Клинические формы хронической Эпштейн–Барр-вирусной инфекции: вопросы диагностики и лечения. Лечащий врач. 2009; 9: 50–9.
[Malashenkova I.K., Didkovskii N.A., Sarsaniia Zh.Sh. et al. Klinicheskie formy khronicheskoi Epshtein–Barr-virusnoi infektsii: voprosy diagnostiki i lecheniia. Lechashchii vrach. 2009; 9: 50–9 (in Russian).]
8. Кудин А.П. Эта «безобидная» вирус Эпштейна–Барр инфекция. Часть 1. Характеристика возбудителя. Реакция иммунной системы на вирус. Мед. новости. 2006; 7: 14–22.
[Kudin A.P. Eta "bezobidnaia' virus Epshteina–Barr infektsiia. Chast' 1. Kharakteristika vozbuditelia. Reaktsiia immunnoi sistemy na virus. Med. novosti. 2006; 7: 14–22 (in Russian).]
9. Мирошникова М.И., Казмирчук В.Е. Выявление осложнений Эпштейна–Барр вирусной инфекции. Перинаталогія та педіатрія. 2002; 4: 51–8.
[Miroshnikova M.I., Kazmirchuk V.E. Vyiavlenie oslozhnenii Epshteina–Barr virusnoi infektsii. Perinatalogіia ta pedіatrіia. 2002; 4: 51–8 (in Russian).]
10. Редькин Ю.В., Одокиенко А.Ю. Инфекционные заболевания: особенности взаимоотношений в системе «инфект-хозяин». Иммунопатология, аллергология, инфектология. 2005; 2: 73–9.
[Red'kin Iu.V., Odokienko A.Iu. Infektsionnye zabolevaniia: osobennosti vzaimootnoshenii v sisteme "infekt-khoziain'. Immunopatologiia, allergologiia, infektologiia. 2005; 2: 73–9 (in Russian).]
11. Abdulkarim B, Sabri S, Zelenika D et al. Antiviral agent Cidofovir decreases Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) oncoproteins and enhances the radiosensitivity in EBV-related malignancies. Oncogene. 2003; 22: 2260–71.
12. Tugizov S, Herrera R, Veluppillai P et al. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-infected monocytes facilitate dissemination of EBV within the oral mucosal epithelium. J Virol 2007; 81 (11): 5484–96.
13. Ahsan N, Kanda T, Nagashima K, Takada K. Epstein–Barr virus transforming protein LMP1 plays a critical role in virus production. J Virol 2005; 79 (7): 4415–24.
14. Bieging KT, Amick AC, Longnecker R. Epstein–Barr virus LMP2A bypasses p53 inactivation in a MYC model of lymphomagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 7: 17945–50.
15. Biron CA, Segal PB, Levy DE et al. Stats in immune responses to viral infections / Signal transducers and activators of transcription (STATs). Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. P. 381–97.16. Ehlin-Henriksson B, Mowafi F, Klein G, Nilsson A. Epstein–Barr virus infection negatively impacts the CXCR4-dependent migration of tonsillar B cells. Immunology 2006; 117 (3): 379–85.
17. Lucchesi W, Brady G, Dittrich-Breiholz O et al. Differential gen regulation by Epstein–Barr virus type 1 and type 2 EBNA2. J Virol 2008; 82 (15): 7456–66.
18. Leigh R, Nyirjesy P. Genitourinary manifestations of Epstein–Barr virus infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2009; 11 (6): 449–56.
19. Adler B, Schaadt E, Kempkes B et al. Control of Epstein–Barr virus reactivation by activated CD40 and viral latent membrane protein 1. PNAS 2002; 99 (1): 437–42.
20. Kalla M, Schmeinck A, Bergbauer M et al. AP-1 homolog BZLF1 of Epstein–Barr virus has two essential functions dependent on the epigenetic state of the viral genome. PNAS 2010; 107: 850–5.
21. Лукьянова Н.Ю., Кулик Г.И., Чехун В.Ф. Роль генов р53 и bcl2 в апоптозе и лекарственной резистентности опухолей. Вопросы онкологии. 2000; 46 (2): 121–8.
[Luk'ianova N.Iu., Kulik G.I., Chekhun V.F. Rol' genov r53 i bcl2 v apoptoze i lekarstvennoi rezistentnosti opukholei. Voprosy onkologii. 2000; 46 (2): 121–8 (in Russian).]
22. Рабсон А., Ройт А., Делвейз П. Основы медицинской иммунологии. Пер. с англ. Москва: Мир, 2006.
[Rabson A., Roit A., Delveiz P. Osnovy meditsinskoi immunologii. Per. s angl. Moscow: Mir, 2006 (in Russian).]
23. Доброхотова Ю.Э., Джобава Э.М., Озерова Р.И. Неразвивающаяся беременность. Москва, 2010.
[Dobrokhotova Iu.E., Dzhobava E.M., Ozerova R.I. Nerazvivaiushchaiasia beremennost'. Moscow, 2010 (in Russian).]
24. Долгушина Н.В., Макацария А.Д. Вирусные инфекции у беременных. Москва: Триада-Х, 2004.
[Dolgushina N.V., Makatsariia A.D. Virusnye infektsii u beremennykh. Moscow: Triada-Kh, 2004 (in Russian).]
25. Желязникова Г.Ф. Воздействие вирусов на систему цитокинов хозяина. Вопросы вирусологии. 2002; 4: 6–8.
[Zheliaznikova G.F. Vozdeistvie virusov na sistemu tsitokinov khoziaina. Voprosy virusologii. 2002; 4: 6–8 (in Russian).]
26. Шмагель К.В., Черешнев В.А. Иммунитет беременной женщины. Москва: Медицинская книга, 2003.
[Shmagel' K.V., Chereshnev V.A. Immunitet beremennoi zhenshchiny. Moscow: Meditsinskaia kniga, 2003 (in Russian).]
27. Горейко Т.В., Калинина Н.М., Дрыгина Л.Б. Роль цитокинов в патогенезе хронической инфекции, вызванной вирусом Эпштейна–Барр. Цитокины и воспаление. 2011; 4: 56–7.
[Goreiko T.V., Kalinina N.M., Drygina L.B. Rol' tsitokinov v patogeneze khronicheskoi infektsii, vyzvannoi virusom Epshteina–Barr. Tsitokiny i vospalenie. 2011; 4: 56–7 (in Russian).]
28. Самарин Д.В. Современные подходы к диагностике Эпштейна–Барр вирусной инфекции. Клінічна імунологія. Алергологія. Інфектологія. 2008; 2: 15–8.
[Samarin D.V. Sovremennye podkhody k diagnostike Epshteina–Barr virusnoi infektsii. Klіnіchna іmunologіia. Alergologіia. Іnfektologіia. 2008; 2: 15–8 (in Russian).]
29. Pembrey L, Raynor P, Griffiths P et al. Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus, Epstein Barr Virus and Varicella Zoster Virus among Pregnant Women in Bradford: A Cohort Study. PLoS One 2013; 8 (11): e81881. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081881 PMCID: PMC3842274.
30. Rudzik AE, Breakey A, Bribiescas RG. Oxytocin and Epstein-Barr virus: Stress biomarkers in the postpartum period among first-time mothers from São Paulo, Brazil. Am J Hum Biol 2014; 26 (1): 43–50. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22489. PMID: 24265252.
31. Zhu P, Chen YJ, Hao JH et al. Biological markers of stress in pregnancy: associations with chronic placental inflammation at delivery. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (7): 557–64. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329187. PMID: 23271381.
32. Авруцкая В.В., Мелконов Э.Ю., Орлов А. В. и др. Способ прогнозирования внутриутробного инфицирования вирусом Эпштена-Барр. Патент РФ № 2276363. 2006.
[Avrutskaia V.V., Melkonov E.Iu., Orlov A. V. et al. Sposob prognozirovaniia vnutriutrobnogo infitsirovaniia virusom Epshtena-Barr. Patent RF № 2276363. 2006 (in Russian).]
33. Савичева А.М. Проблемы диагностики и терапии репродуктивно значимых инфекций. Акушерство и женские болезни. 2006; LV (20): 76–86.
[Savicheva A.M. Problemy diagnostiki i terapii reproduktivno znachimykh infektsii. Akusherstvo i zhenskie bolezni. 2006; LV (20): 76–86 (in Russian).]
34. Логутова Л.С., Петрухин В.А., Ахвледиани К.Н. и др. Эффективность ангиопротекторов при лечении беременных с плацентарной недостаточностью. Российский вестник акушера – гинеколога. 2007; 2: 45–50. [Logutova L.S., Petruxin V.A., Axvlediani K.N. et al. The effectiveness of angioprotectors in the treatment of pregnant women with placental insufficiency. Rossijskij vestnik akushera – ginekologa. 2007; 2: 45–50 (in Russian).]
35. Краснопольский В.И., Тареева Т.Г., Малиновский В.В. и др. Мониторинг беременных с вирусными инфекциями семейства герпес. Москва, 2006.
[Krasnopol'skii V.I., Tareeva T.G., Malinovskii V.V. et al. Monitoring beremennykh s virusnymi infektsiiami semeistva gerpes. Moscow, 2006 (in Russian).]
36. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. No. 82 June 2007. Management of herpes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109 (6): 1489–98.

For citation:Agaeva M.I., Agaeva Z.A. Characteristic features of the course of herpesvirus infections during pregnancy. Clinical review for general practice. 2022; 1: 49–55. DOI: 10.47407/kr2022.3.1.00118


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru