Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2023 > Vol 4, №10 (2023) > Microbial landscape of pressure ulcers in patients with severe injuries of the central nervous system

Microbial landscape of pressure ulcers in patients with severe injuries of the central nervous system

Leonid I. Bubman , Svetlana V. Topolyanskaya , Karine A. Lytkina , Georgiy G. Melkonyan , Elena V. Kozhevnikova , Marina A. Gladkikh , Svetlana A. Rachina , Leonid I. Dvoretsky

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Research goal. To investigate the incidence of pressure ulcers and the structure of bacterial pathogens in young patients who have suffered severe trauma to the brain or spinal cord.
Materials and methods. The prospective observational study included 69 patients who had suffered a severe brain or spinal cord injury within 3 to 9 months prior to admission to the hospital. During the stay in the hospital, a microbiological study of biopsy specimens obtained during the surgical treatment of pressure ulcers was regularly carried out.
Results. All study participants were male. The age of the patients included in the study ranged from 19 to 52 years, mean – 31.4±7.8 years. Pressure ulcers were observed in 37 of 69 patients (53.6%). Initially, microbiological examination most often revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa – 13 patients (35.1%), Staphylococcus aureus – 11 (29.7%), Enterococcus faecalis – 7 (18.9%), Proteus mirabilis – 5 (13.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae – in 4 (10.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii – in 1 (2.7%). In total, 62.2% of patients were prescribed antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected pressure ulcers, 37.8% did not receive antibiotic therapy or antibiotics were prescribed only for the purpose of perioperative antibiotic therapy (during plastic closure). Along with traditional therapy, 20 patients (54%), after necrectomy, were given a vacuum-asssisted dressing, from 1 to 7 sessions, lasting from 3 to 7 days. Against the background of the therapy, in 21 cases it was possible to achieve complete elimination of microorganisms, especially when infected with P. aeruginosa. During inpatient treatment, only two patients had the same microflora in pressure ulcers (S. aureus), other patients registered superinfection. In 15 patients accession of Enterococcus spp. was observed (1 has extremely resistant strains, 1 has polyresistant strains). In 10 patients, infection with K. pneumoniae was registered (in 3, extremely resistant strains, in 4, polyresistant, in 1, pan-resistant), in 9 – Proteus spp. (in 6 – extremely resistant strains, in 1 – pan-resistant, in 1 – multi-resistant), in 6 – S. aureus (in 4 – multi-resistant strains), in 3 – Escherichia coli (susceptible strains), in 3 – A. baumannii (in 2 – pan-resistant strains, in 1 – multi-resistant strains). During inpatient treatment, autodermoplasty was performed in 14 patients (37.8%), in 13 of these cases it was successful.
Conclusion. The results of a pilot study indicate the effectiveness of combination therapy with antibacterial drugs and VAC-therapy in young patients with infected pressure ulcers caused by severe injuries of the central nervous system.
Key words: pressure ulcers, young, infection, resistance, vacuum-asssisted-therapy, antibacterial drugs.

About the Author

Leonid I. Bubman 1 , Svetlana V. Topolyanskaya 2 , Karine A. Lytkina 1 , Georgiy G. Melkonyan 3 , Elena V. Kozhevnikova 1 , Marina A. Gladkikh 1 , Svetlana A. Rachina 4 , Leonid I. Dvoretsky 4

1 War Veterans Hospital No3, Moscow, Russia

2 War Veterans Hospital No3, Moscow, Russia; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia

3 War Veterans Hospital No3, Moscow, Russia; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia

4 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia

References

1. Lessing NL, Mwesige S, Lazaro A et al. Pressure ulcers after traumatic spinal injury in East Africa: risk factors, illustrative case, and low-cost protocol for prevention and treatment. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020; 6 (1): 48. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-020-0294-5
2. Shiferaw WS, Akalu TY, Mulugeta H et al. The global burden of pressure ulcers among patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 1: 1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03369-0
3. Balasuberamaniam P, Wasim A, Shrikumar M et al. Predictors of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in patients with complete spinal cord injury: a retrospective case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24 (1): 329. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06369-y
4. Goldman RJ. Pressure ulcer management in disorders of the CNS. Available at: https://now.aapmr.org/pressure-ulcer-management-in-disorders-of-the-cns/ Assessed: 07.05.2023.
5. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. Available at: https://www.internationalguideline.com/ Assessed: 07.05.2023.
6. Osis SL, de Oliveira AM, Marinho AR et al. Factors for the development of pressure ulcers in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2015; 19 (Suppl. 2): P86. DOI: 10.1186/cc14715
7. Eslami V, Saadat S, Habibi Arejan R et al. Factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012; 50 (12): 899–903. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.75
8. Zakrasek E, Creasey G, Crew J. Pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in devel-oping nations. Spinal Cord. 2015; 53: 7–13. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2014.179
9. Chen Y, Devivo MJ, Jackson AB. Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord in-jury: age-period-duration effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (6): 1208–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.023
10. Morse S. Pressure ulcers cost the health system $26.8 billion a year, Healthcare Finance. 2019. Available at: https://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/pressure-ulcers-cost-health-system-268-billion-year. Assessed: 07.05.2023.
11. Dana AN, Bauman WA. Bacteriology of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: What we know and what we should know. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015; 38 (2): 147–60. DOI: 10.1179/ 2045772314Y.0000000234
12. Рекомендации «Определение чувствительности микроорганизмов к антимикробным препаратам. Версия 2021-01». Режим доступа: https://www.antibiotic.ru/files/321/clrec-dsma2021.pdf (дата обращения:)
13. Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012; 18: 268–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x
14. Rubulotta F, Brett S, Boulanger C et al.; UK Collaborating Site Investigators; DecubICUs study team and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Trials’ Group UK Collaborators. Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 2022; 12 (11): e057010. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057010
15. Sadeghi Fazel F, Mohammadnejad A, Amanpour S et al. Bacteriology ans antimicrobial sensitivity of isolated bacteria from pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury. Arch Neurosci. 2019; 6 (2): e12446. DOI: 10.5812/ans.12446
16. Braga IA, Brito CS, Filho AD, et al. Pressure ulcer as a reservoir of multiresistant Gram-negative bacilli: risk factors for colonization and development of bacteremia. Braz J Infect Dis. 2017; 21 (2): 171–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.11.007
17. Dunyach-Remy C, Salipante F, Lavigne JP et al. Pressure ulcers microbiota dynamics and wound evolution. Sci Rep. 2021; 18506. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98073-x
18. Ploumis A, Mpourazanis G, Martzivanou C et al. The Role of Vacuum Assisted Closure in Patients with Pressure Ulcer and Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review. World J Plast Surg. 2019; 8 (3): 279–84. DOI: 10.29252/wjps.8.3.279
19. Gabriel A, Shores J, Bernstein B et al. A clinical review of infected wound treatment with Vacuum Assisted Closure (V.A.C.) therapy: experience and case series. Int Wound J. 2009; 6 (Suppl. 2): 1–25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00628.x
20. Mouës CM, Vos MC, van den Bemd GJ et al. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2004; 12 (1): 11–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12105.x
21. Saadi A, Perentes JY, Gonzalez M et al. Vacuum-assisted closure device: a useful tool in the management of severe intrathoracic infections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91: 1582.
22. Steingrimsson S, Gottfredsson M, Gudmundsdottir I et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy for deep sternal wound infections reduces the rate of surgical interventions for early re-infections. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012; 15: 406.
23. Weed T, Ratliff C, Drake DB. Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure wound therapy: does the wound VAC enhance bacterial clearance? Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 276.

For citation:Bubman L.I., Topolyanskaya S.V., Lytkina K.A. et al. Microbial landscape of pressure ulcers in patients with severe injuries of the central nervous system. Clinical review for general practice. 2023; 4 (10): 51–59 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2023.4.10.00341


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru