Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2023 > Vol 4, №2 (2023) > Current practice of blood glucose self-monitoring: the basis for effective control of diabetes mellitus

Current practice of blood glucose self-monitoring: the basis for effective control of diabetes mellitus

Elena V. Biryukova , Mikhail V. Shinkin , Inna V. Soloveva

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Chronic hyperglycemia being a major factor of the diabetes complications requires effective treatment aimed at achieving metabolic targets since the moment of the diabetes mellitus (DM) diagnosis. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) together with assessment of HbA1c levels have been included in the current recommendatiions as the main method for estimation of glycemic control. The paper discusses therapeutic targets and the main issues of blood glucose self-monitoring (SMBG) during treatment of DM. The value of SMBG for patients and physicians is analyzed. The use of SMBG allows the physician to objectively assess the effectiveness of the prescribed treatment and enables the patient's active engagement in the therapy process. The recommended SMBG frequency that depends on the hypoglycemic therapy is discussed. The research data on the SMBG efficacy are provided. Self-monitoring of blood glucose by patients with DM requires high-precision glucose meter to achieve and maintain the glucose levels. The paper touches upon the issues of choosing the glucose meter. Compliance with the accuracy standards is an important criterion for choosing the glucose meter. 
Keywords: diabetes mellitus, complications, self-monitoring of blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, hypoglycemia, glucose meters.

About the Author

Elena V. Biryukova 1 , Mikhail V. Shinkin 2 , Inna V. Soloveva 1

1 Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russia; Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

2 Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К. и др. Эпидемиологические характеристики сахарного диабета в Российской Федерации: клинико-статистический анализ по данным регистра сахарного диабета на 01.01.2021. Сахарный диабет. 2021; 24 (3): 204–21. DOI: 10.14341/DM12759 [Dedov I.I., SHestakova M.V., Vikulova O.K. et al. Epidemiological characteristics of diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation: clinical and statistical analysis according to the Federal diabetes register data of 01.01.2021. Diabetes Care. 2021; 24 (3): 204–21. DOI: 10.14341/DM12759 (in Russian).]
2. WHO. http://www.emro.who.int/noncommunicable-diseases/ diabetes/index.html
3. Bommer C, Sagalova V, Heesemann E et al. Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care 2018; 41 (5): 963–70. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-1962
4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1995; 44 (8): 968–83.
5. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321 (7258): 405–12. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
6. Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ et al. Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia 2019; 62 (1): 3–16. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-018-4711-2
7. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В. Феномен «метаболической памяти» в прогнозировании риска развития сосудистых осложнений при сахарном диабете. Терапевтический архив. 2015; 87 (10): 4–10. DOI: 10.17116/terarkh201587104-10 [Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V. The metabolic memory phenomenon in predicting a risk for vascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Terapevticheskij arhiv. 2015; 87 (10): 4–10. DOI: 10.17116/terarkh201587104-10 (in Russian).]
8. Roberto T, Rita BA, Prattichizzo F et al. The “Metabolic Memory” theory and the early treatment of hyperglycemia in prevention of diabetic complications. Nutrients 2017; 9 (5): 437. DOI: 10.3390/nu9050437
9. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Под ред. И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой, А.Ю. Майорова. 10-й вып. (доп.). М., 2021. DOI: 10.14341/ DM12802 [Standards of specialized diabetes care. Edited by I.I. Dedov, M.V. Shestakova, A.Yu. Mayorov. 10 Edition (revised). Moscow, 2021. DOI: 10.14341/DM12802 (in Russian).]
10. ADA Professional Practice Committee. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 2022; 45 (Suppl. 1): S125-S143. DOI: 10.2337/dc22- S009
11. Егшатян Л.В., Бирюкова Е.В. Влияния железодефицитной анемии на значения гликированного гемоглобина. Лечение и профилактика. 2015; 2 (14): 60–4. [Egshatyan L.V., Biryukova E.V. Vliyaniya zhelezodeficitnoj anemii na znacheniya glikirovannogo gemoglobina. Lechenie i profilaktika. 2015; 2 (14): 60–4 (in Russian).]
12. Bloomgarden Z, Handelsman Y. How does CKD affect HbA1c? J Diabetes 2018; 10 (4): 270. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12624
13. Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c). Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (3): 881–5. DOI: 10.2337/ diacare.26.3.881
14. Кононенко И.В., Смирнова О.М. Значение комплексного контроля гликемии при сахарном диабете 2-го типа. Проблемы эндокринологии. 2010: 5; 43–51. [Kononenko I.V., Smirnova O.M. Znachenie kompleksnogo kontrolya glikemii pri saharnom diabete 2-go tipa. Problemy endokrinologii. 2010: 5; 43–51 (in Russian).]
15. Майоров А.Ю., Мельникова О.Г., Филиппов Ю.И. Самоконтроль гликемии – основа эффективного лечения сахарного диабета. Эффективная фармакотерапия. Эндокринология. 2014; 46 (5): 62–72. [Majorov A.Yu., Mel'nikova O.G., Filippov Yu.I. Samokontrol' glikemii – osnova effektivnogo lecheniya saharnogo diabeta. Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya. Endokrinologiya. 2014; 46 (5): 62–72 (in Russian).]
16. Moström P, Ahlén E, Imberg H et al. Adherence of self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 1 diabetes in Sweden. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017; 5 (1): e000342. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016- 000342
17. Rossi MC, Lucisano G, Ceriello A et al. AMD Annals-SMBG Study Group. Real-world use of self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes: an urgent need for improvement. Acta Diabetol 2018; 55 (10): 1059–66. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-018-1186-z
18. Анциферов М.Б., Котешкова О.М. Управление сахарным диабетом: значение структурированного самоконтроля. Фарматека. 2014; 5 (278): 81–5. [Anciferov M.B., Koteshkova O.M. Upravlenie saharnym diabetom: znachenie strukturirovannogo samokontrolya. Farmateka. 2014; 5 (278): 81–5 (in Russian).]
19. Molfetta SD, Bosi E, Ceriello A et al. Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose is associated with more appropriate therapeutic interventions than unstructured self-monitoring: A novel analysis of data from the PRISMA trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 181: 109070. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109070
20. Pacheco A, van de Sande-Lee S, Sandova R et al. Effects of a structured education program on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2017; 61 (6): 534–41. DOI: 10.1590/2359- 3997000000278 Литература / References | КЛИНИЧЕСКИЙ РАЗБОР В ОБщЕЙ МЕДИЦИНЕ | ТОМ 4 | №2 | 2023 | Clinical review for general practice | vol. 4 | no. 2 | 2023 | 67 Обзор / Review
21. Hansen MV, Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Heller SR et al. Frequency and motieves of blood glucose self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes: association with glycaemic control, complications, and patient characteristics. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009; 85 (2): 183–8. DOI: 10.1016/j. diabres.2009.04.022
22. Кузина И.А., Гончарова Е.В., Мартиросян Н.С. и др. Исторические аспекты диагностики и контроля сахарного диабета. Терапевтический архив. 2022; 94 (10): 1216–20. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.10.201890 [Kuzina I.A., Goncharova E.V., Martirosyan N.S. et al. Historical aspects of diagnosis and control of diabetes mellitus. Terapevticheskij arhiv. 2022; 94 (10): 1216–20. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022. 10.201890 (in Russian).]
23. Knapp S, Manroa P, Doshi K. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: Advice for providers and patients. Cleveland Clin J Med 2016, 83 (5): 355–60. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.83a.14147
24. Bode BW. The Accuracy and Interferences in Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose. US Endocrine Disease 2007: 46–8. DOI: 10.17925/ USE.2007.00.2.46
25. Sia HK, Kor CT, Tu ST. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in association with glycemic control in newly diagnosed non-insulin-treated diabetes patients: a retrospective cohort study. Scientific Reports 2021; 11 (1): 1176. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81024-x
26. Machry RV, Rados DV, Gregório GR, Rodrigues TC. Self-monitoring blood glucose improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes without intensive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 142: 173–87. DOI: 10.1016/j. diabres.2018.05.037
27. Mannucci E, Antenore A, Giorgino F, Scavini M. Effects of structured versus unstructured self-monitoring of blood glucose on glucose control in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 12: 183–9. DOI: 10.1177/1932296817719290
28. Lalić NM, Lalić K, Jotić A et al. The Impact of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Combined With Intensive Education on HbA1c Levels, Hospitalizations, and Quality-of-Life Parameters in Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes at Primary Care in Serbia: The Multicenter SPA-EDU Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11 (4): 746–52. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816681323
29. Schnell O, Alawi H, Battelino T et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: recent studies. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013; 7: 478–88. DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700225
30. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D et al. Frequency of SMBG Correlates with HbA1c and Acute Complications in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2011; 12 (1): 11–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2010.00650.x
31. Tomah S, Mahmoud N, Mottalib A et al. Frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose in relation to weight loss and A1C during intensive multidisciplinary weight management in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. BMJ Open Diab Res Care 2019; 7 (1): e000659. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000659
32. Schnell O, Alawi H, Battelino T et al. Addressing schemes of self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes: a European perspective and expert recommendation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13 (9): 959–65. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0028
33. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009; 3 (4): 971–80. DOI: 10.1177/193229680900300446
34. International Organization for Standardization. International Standard EN ISO 15197:2013. In Vitro diagnostic test systems: Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. Second Edition 2013-05-15. International Organization for Standardization, 2013. www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15197:ed-2:v1:en
35. Bailey T, Wallace JF, Christiansen M. Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device. J Diabetes Sci Technology 2017; 11 (4): 736–43. DOI: 10.1177/1932296816680829
36. Pardo S, Shaginian RM, Simmons DA. Accuracy beyond ISO: Introducing a new method for distinguishing differences between blood glucose monitoring systems meeting ISO 15197:2013 accuracy requirements. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 12 (3): 650–6. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818762509
37. Stedman M, Rea R, Duff CJ et al. People with type diabetes mellitus (T1DM) self-reported views on their own condition management reveal links to potentially improved outcomes and potential areas for service improvement. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 170: 108479. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108479
38. Stedman M, Rea R, Duff CJ et al. Self-reported views on managing type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021; 15 (1): 198–200. DOI: 10.1177/1932296820937771
39. Campos-Náñez E, Breton MD. Effect of BGM Accuracy on the Clinical Performance of CGM: An In-Silico Study J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017; 11 (6): 1196–206. DOI: 10.1177/1932296817710476

For citation:Biryukova E.V., Shinkin M.V., Soloveva I.V. Current practice of blood glucose self-monitoring: the basis for effective control of diabetes mellitus. Clinical review for general practice. 2023; 4 (2): 60–67. DOI: 10.47407/kr2023.4.2.00205


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru