Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2023 > Vol 4, №4 (2023) > Difficulties of differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in acute brucellosis (clinical cases)

Difficulties of differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in acute brucellosis (clinical cases)

Nikita A. Tereshkin , Tatiana Ya. Chernobrovkina , Svetlana V. Burova , Anna A. Skryabina

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella, characterized by prolonged fever with damage to the musculoskeletal system, nervous, reproductive, cardiovascular and other systems, prone to chronic course. The highest incidence of brucellosis (including among children) over the past 10 years in Russia is registered in Dagestan. One of the manifestations of the reaction of the immune system to the spread of infection in the acute course of brucellosis is generalized lymphadenopathy. Brucella is able to induce incomplete phagocytosis, as a result of which, with a significant accumulation of the pathogen, the lymph nodes become a source of bacteria reproduction, from where they can enter the bloodstream and spread to the cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system, liver, spleen, bone marrow and other organs. With long-term preservation of the pathogen in tissues and organs, brucella causes a specific inflammatory reaction with the formation of granulomas. The acute form of brucellosis is characterized by high fever with a fairly good tolerance. At the end of the first week of the disease, lymphadenopathy appears, an increase in the liver and spleen. All groups of lymph nodes can increase, they can be sensitive to palpation. With the transition of the acute form of brucellosis to the chronic form, the size of the lymph nodes often decrease, sclerosis, become dense on palpation and painless. This condition is called micropolyadenitis. According to the literature, the frequency of lymphadenopathy in the acute course of brucellosis varies greatly, which, apparently, is due to the lack of clear criteria for assessing damage to the lymph nodes, as well as assessing the duration of the disease and the presence of the fact of prescribed antibiotic therapy. The study of lymph nodes in brucellosis is an important part of the general examination of the patient, however, the presence of lymphadenopathy does not always indicate the course of this nosology. In addition, the absence of lymphadenopathy does not rule out brucellosis. The article presents three clinical cases that demonstrate the difficulty in diagnosing brucellosis and the low alertness of doctors in relation to this disease in a non-endemic region. 
Key words: lymphadenopathy, brucellosis, lymph nodes, clinical case

About the Author

Nikita A. Tereshkin 1 , Tatiana Ya. Chernobrovkina 1 , Svetlana V. Burova 1 , Anna A. Skryabina 1

1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Динова Е.А., Щербина А.Ю., Румянцев А.Г. Дифференциальная диагностика лимфоаденопатий в практике врача. Трудный пациент. 2007; 5 (2): 15–6. [Dinova E.A., SHCHerbina A.YU., Rumyancev A.G. Differencial'naya diagnostika limfoadenopatij v praktike vracha. Trudnyj pacient. 2007; 5 (2): 15–6 (in Russian).] 
2. Maini R, Nagalli S. Lymphadenopathy. [Updated 2022 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558918/ 
3. Войцеховский В.В. Лимфаденопатии в клинической практике. Амурский медицинский журнал. 2017; 1 (17): 8–19. [Vojcekhovskij V.V. Limfadenopatii v klinicheskoj praktike. Amurskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2017; 1 (17): 8–19 (in Russian).] 
4. Gaddey HL, Riegel AM. Unexplained lymphadenopathy: Evaluation and differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 2016; 94 (11): 896– 903. 
5. Sato K, Uchiyama M. Lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly in a patient with acute myelogenous leukaemia. BMJ Case Rep 2011; 2011: bcr1020114997. DOI: 10.1136/bcr.10.2011.4997 
6. Kansiime C, Rutebemberwa E, Asiimwe BB et al. Annual trends of human brucellosis in pastoralist communities of south-western Uganda: a retrospective ten-year study. Infect Dis Poverty 2015; 4: 39 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-015-0072-y 
7. Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека. Государственный доклад «О состоянии санитарно-эпидемиологического благополучия населения». Москва: Федеральная служба по надзору в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека, 2022. [Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka. Gosudarstvennyj doklad «O sostoyanii sanitarno-epidemiologicheskogo blagopoluchiya naseleniya». Moscow: Federal'naya sluzhba po nadzoru v sfere zashchity prav potrebitelej i blagopoluchiya cheloveka, 2022 (in Russian).] 
8. De-Figueiredo P, Ficht TA. Pathogenesis and immunobiology of brucellosis: review of Brucella-host interactions. Am j Pathol 2015; 185 (6): 1505–17. 
9. Mufinda FC, Boinas F, Nunes C. Prevalence and factors associated with human brucellosis in livestock professionals. Rev Saude Publica 2017; 51: 57. DOI: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2017051006051 
10. Данилов А.Н., Безрукова Г.А., Спирин В.Ф. Современные аспекты эпидемиологии профессионального бруцеллеза. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2019; 59 (9): 610–1. [Danilov A.N., Bezrukova G.A., Spirin V.F. Sovremennye aspekty epidemiologii professional'nogo brucelleza. Medicina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2019; 59 (9): 610–1 (in Russian).] 
11. Moreno E, Barquero-Calvo E. The Role of Neutrophils in Brucellosis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2020; 84 (4): e00048-20. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00048-20 
12. Вершилова П.А., Голубева А.А., Кайтмазова Е.И. и др. Бруцеллез. М.: Медицина, 1972. [Brucellosis. Vershilova P.A., Golubeva A.A., Kaitmazova E.I. et al. Moscow: Medicine, 1972 (in Russian).] 
13. Varona JF, Guerra JM, Guillén V et al. Isolated cervical lymphadenopathy as unique manifestation of Brucellosis. Scand J Infect Dis 2002; 34 (7): 538–40. DOI: 10.1080/003655402320208802 
14. von Bargen K, Gagnaire A, Arce-Gorvel V et al. Cervical Lymph Nodes as a Selective Niche for Brucella during Oral Infections. PLoS ONE 2014; 10 (4): e0121790. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121790 
15. Kawano-Dourado L, Peirera DA, Kawassaki Ade M et al. Lymphadenopathy and fever in a chef during a stay in Europe. J Bras Pneumol 2015; 41 (2): 191–5. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-37132015000004412 
16. Franco MP, Mulder M, Gilman RH et al. Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007; 7 (12): 775–86. DOI: 10.1016/S1473- 3099(07)70286-4 
17. Köse Ş, Serin Senger S, Akkoçlu G et al. Clinical manifestations, complications, and treatment of brucellosis: Evaluation of 72 cases. Turk J Med Sci 2014; 44: 220–3. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1112-34 
18. Zheng R, Xie S, Lu X et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Human Brucellosis in China. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 5712920. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5712920


For citation:Tereshkin N.A., Chernobrovkina T.Ya., Burova S.V., Skryabina A.A. Difficulties of differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy in acute brucellosis (clinical cases). Clinical review for general practice. 2023; 4 (4): 98–103. DOI: 10.47407/kr2023.4.4.00262


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru