Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2023 > Vol 4, №9 (2023) > Pathogenetic features of pelvic floor dysfunction development in women of child-bearing age

Pathogenetic features of pelvic floor dysfunction development in women of child-bearing age

Liliya R. Toktar , Mekan R. Orazov , Veranika E. Pak , Rustam F. Gaifullin , Lyudmila M. Mikhaleva , Konstantin Yu. Midiber , Irina A. Samsonova , Zarina N. Kamarova , Shakhlo M. Dostieva

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Background. Today, the issue of genital prolapse remains in the spotlight all over the world. This condition accounts for 30–40% of all cases of gynecological diseases. It should be noted that a third of women are women of child-bearing age. The problem of understanding true prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (РОР) in various age groups is that there are no severe clinical symptoms during early stages of the disease, which ham-pers the diagnosis and, consequently, assessment of the prevalence of genital prolapse. That is why the prevalence of genital prolapse in women of child-bearing age has been little studied in the world literature. The other feature of the РОР diagnosis in young women is that it is difficult to verify pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) before POP manifestation. Patients often do not seek medical care, since the complaints they present with are not typical for the concept of PFD. The patients’ complaints most often turn out to be related to abnormal vaginal biocenosis or even inflam-matory diseases of the pelvis, sexual dysfunctions. No treatment of such conditions results in abnormal anatomic and topographic interaction be-tween vaginal walls, reduced barrier function of introitus vaginae and altered vaginal microbiota composition, therefore, the woman suffers from recurrent pain that significantly reduces her quality of life.
Aim. To study the perineal tissue state during the development of PFD.
Methods. The prospective randomized comparative cohort study involved 155 women, who contacted the Department of Gynecology for elective surgical treatment. All patients underwent standard clinical and instrumental assessment for gynecological patients: history taking, physical ex-amination, advanced gynecological assessment, pelvic ultrasound. The assessment program was expanded to complex perineological examination including pelvic floor evaluation according to the method by L.R. Toktar, perineal manometry using the iEase XFT-0010 perineometer (according to the unit user manual), transperineal ultrasound. In addition, evaluation of vaginal biotope and morphological assessment of the levator com-plex were performed.
Results. According to the data obtained, abnormal vaginal biotope is the major atypical PFD symptom. This condition is recurrent. The vaginal wall loss of elasticity and abnormal collagenization result in the more profound perineal tissue alterations. Morphological assessment of perineal tissues has revealed levator ani inflammation in 20% of cases and fibrosis in 100% of cases. 
Conclusions. Recurrent vaginal biocenosis abnormality is a clinical symptom of PFD. Vaginal dysbiosis results in morphological alterations in the vaginal wall structure and probably in the entire levator complex.
Key words: pelvic floor dysfunction, genital prolapse, pelvic floor, vaginal biocenosis.

About the Author

Liliya R. Toktar 1 , Mekan R. Orazov 1 , Veranika E. Pak 1 , Rustam F. Gaifullin 1 , Lyudmila M. Mikhaleva 2 , Konstantin Yu. Midiber 1 , Irina A. Samsonova 1 , Zarina N. Kamarova 1 , Shakhlo M. Dostieva 1

1 Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

2 Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Радзинский В.Е., Оразов М.Р., Токтар Л.Р. и др. Перинеология. Эстетическая гинекология. Под ред. В.Е. Радзинского. М.: Редакция журнала StatusPraesens, 2020; с. 416.
Radzinskii V.E., Orazov M.R., Toktar L.R. et al. Perineologiia. Esteticheskaia ginekologiia. Pod red. V.E. Radzinskogo. M.: Redaktsiia zhurnala StatusPraesens, 2020; р. 416 (in Russian).
2. Токтар Л.Р. Женская пролаптология: от патогенеза к эффективности профилактики и лечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017; 3: 101–10.
Toktar L.R. Zhenskaia prolaptologiia: ot patogeneza k effektivnosti profilaktiki i lecheniia. Akusherstvo i ginekologiia. 2017; 3: 101–10 (in Russian).
3. Weintraub AY, Glinter H, Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46 (1): 5–14. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0581
4. Zhang YH, Lu YX, Liu X et al. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2019; 54 (7): 445–51. [Chinese.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.07.003. PMID: 31365956.
5. Приказ Минздрава России от 20.10.2020 №1130н «Об утверждении Порядка оказания медицинской помощи по профилю "Акушерство и гинекология"».
Prikaz Minzdrava Rossii ot 20.10.2020 №1130n «Ob utverzhdenii Poriadka okazaniia meditsinskoi pomoshchi po profiliu "Akusherstvo i ginekologiia"» (in Russian).
6. Клинический протокол «Диагностика и лечение заболеваний, сопровождающихся патологическими выделениями из половых путей женщин». 2019.
Klinicheskii protokol «Diagnostika i lechenie zabolevanii, soprovozhdaiushchikhsia patologicheskimi vydeleniiami iz polovykh putei zhenshchin». 2019 (in Russian).
7. Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия v. 2.0. М.: StatusPraesens, 2017.
Radzinskii V.E. Akusherskaia agressiia v. 2.0. M.: StatusPraesens, 2017 (in Russian).
8. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2013; 24 (11): 1783–90. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9
9. Pushkar DY, Kasyan GR, Popov AA. Robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a review of current literature. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31 (6): 531–6. DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000932. PMID: 34506336.
10. Dietz HP, Chavez-Coloma L, Friedman T, Turel F. Pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparae. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 62 (3): 420–5. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13481. PMID: 35048356; PMCID: PMC9305753.
11. Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M et al. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227 (2): 192–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.046. PMID: 35500611.
12. Deprest JA, Cartwright R, Dietz HP et al. International Urogynecological Consultation (IUC): pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33 (7): 1699–710. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05081-0. PMID: 35267063.
13. Dieter AA, Balk EM, Kanter G et al. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 225 (5): 475.e1-475.e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.042. PMID: 34087227.
14. Li Y, Nie N, Gong L et al. Structural, functional and molecular pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse in patient and Loxl1 deficient mice. Aging (Albany NY) 2021; 13 (24): 25886–902. DOI: 10.18632/aging. 203777. PMID: 34923484; PMCID: PMC8751609.
15. Hickman LC, Tran MC, Davidson ERW et al. Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence in young women undergoing vaginal and abdominal colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31 (12): 2661–7. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04139-w. PMID: 31828397.

For citation:Toktar L.R., Orazov M.R., Pak V.E., Gaifullin R.F., Mikhaleva L.M., Midiber K.Yu., Samsonova I.A., Kamarova Z.N., Dostieva Sh.M. Pathogenetic features of pelvic floor dysfunction development in women of child-bearing age. Clinical review for general practice. 2023; 4 (9): 49–58 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2023.4.9.00308


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru