Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2024 > Vol 5, №11 (2024) > Combat injuries of the lungs and pleura: an analysis of clinical cases

Combat injuries of the lungs and pleura: an analysis of clinical cases

Svetlana V. Topolyanskaya , Dmitriy S. Koshurnikov , Elena V. Antonova , Maria N. Kurzhos , Medina Kh. Pilyarova , Svetlana A. Rachina , Karine A. Lytkina , Georgiy G. Melkonyan

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Aim. To analyze the clinical cases of patients with various combat chest injuries.
Materials and methods. A cross-sectional observational study enrolled 80 patients who had chest wounds in the period from 4 to 67 days (mean 23.8±12.6 days) before admission to the hospital. All study patients were men. The age of study patients varied from 20 to 59 years, mean – 39.6±8.6 years. 62.5% of study patients had mine-blast injuries. All patients underwent clinical and laboratory examination using standard methods, including determination of the C-reactive protein level, blood and biochemistry tests, calculation of leukocytes indices. The patients underwent computed tomography of the chest, and in the presence of pleural effusion, ultrasound examination of he pleural cavities.
Results. Pleural effusion was registered in 68.8% of patients. The mean volume of pleural effusion was 429.3±261 ml, varying from 50 to 1000 ml. In 44 patients (80%) it was unilateral, in 11 (20%) – bilateral. Pulmonary contusion was diagnosed in 38.8% of cases. Foreign bodies in the lung parenchyma and pleural cavities were observed in 32.5% of patients, primary pneumonia – in 15% of patients, wound canal in the lung parenchyma – 10%, pneumothorax was observed in 3 patients, gas bubbles in the pleural cavities – in 5 patients. Drainage of pleural cavities at the previous stages of evacuation was performed in 58.7% of the wounded. Rib fractures were reported in 50% of the wounded. The mean level of C-reactive protein was 49.0 mg/l (0.4–325.6 mg/l), the number of leukocytes was 9.4×109/l (4–19×109/l), the number of neutrophils was 6.4×109/l 
(1.4–16.3×109/l), the number of platelets was 464.6×109/l (165–944×109/l), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio – 4.1 (0.0001–17.75), neutrophil-monocyte ratio – 8,3 (0,0004–27,2), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio – 2,6 (0,11–5,8), platelets-lymphocyte ratio – 278,6 (0,01–653,3), systemic immuno-inflammatory index – 1925,9 (0,05–8296).
Conclusion. In a case of combat trauma, chest injuries are often observed. The most common types of combat chest injuries are pleural effusion, pulmonary contusion and rib fractures.
Keywords: combat trauma, wounds, lungs, pleura, chest, pulmonary contusion, pleural effusion, pneumothorax.

About the Author

Svetlana V. Topolyanskaya 1 , Dmitriy S. Koshurnikov 2 , Elena V. Antonova 2 , Maria N. Kurzhos 2 , Medina Kh. Pilyarova 2 , Svetlana A. Rachina 2 , Karine A. Lytkina 2 , Georgiy G. Melkonyan 3

1 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia; War Veterans Hospital Nо 3, Moscow, Russia

2 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia

3 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Lurin I, Khoroshun E, Negoduiko V et al. Retrieval of ferromagnetic fragments from the lung using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and magnetic tool: a case report of combat patient injured in the war in Ukraine. Int J Emerg Med 2023;16(51). DOI: 10.1186/s12245-023-00527-8
2. Lichtenberger JP, Kim AM, Fisher D et al. Imaging of Combat-Related Thoracic Trauma – Review of Penetrating Trauma. Mil Med 2018;183(3-4):e81-e88. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx034
3. Hughes SM, Borders CW, Aden JK et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Trauma in U.S. Service Members Involved in Combat Operations. Military Medicine 2020;185(11-12):e2131-e2136. DOI: 10.1093/ milmed/usaa165
4. Petricevic A, Ilic N, Bacic A et al. War injuries of the lungs. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11(5):843-7. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)01163-9
5. Mohan P, Mohan R. Management of Warfare Chest Injuries. Med
J Armed Forces India 2010;66(4):329-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(10)80010-3
6. Dogrul BN, Kiliccalan I, Asci ES, Peker SC. Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview. Chin J Traumatol 2020;23(3):125-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.04.003
7. Ivey KM, White CE, Wallum TE et al. Thoracic injuries in US combat casualties: a 10-year review of Operation Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73(Suppl.5):S514-519.
8. Bastidas-Goyes A, Hincapie-Diaz G, Tuta-Quintero E, Rodriguez-Rojas S. Analysis of lung function in a Colombian military with a medical history of thoracic trauma. Rev Med Hosp Gen Méx [online] 2021;84(3):110-5. DOI: 10.24875/hgmx.21000005
9. Keneally R, Szpisjak D. Thoracic trauma in Iraq and Afghanistan.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:1292-7.
10. Propper BW, Gifford SM, Calhoon JH, McNeil JD. Wartime thoracic injury: perspectives in modern warfare. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89(4):1032-5; discussion 1035-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.014
11. Scott TE, Kirkman E, Haque M et al. Primary blast lung injury – a review. Br J Anaesth 2017;118(3):311-6. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew385
12. Lichtenberger JP, Kim AM, Fisher D et al. Imaging of Combat-Related Thoracic Trauma – Blunt Trauma and Blast Lung Injury. Mil Med 2018;183(3-4):e89-e96. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usx033
13. Park PK, Cannon JW, Ye W et al. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81(Suppl 2):S150-156.
14. Chan CM, Shorr AF, Perkins JG. Factors associated with acute lung injury in combat casualties receiving massive blood transfusions: A retrospective analysis. J Critical Care 2012;27(419):e7-e14.
15. Simon B, Ebert J, Bokhari F et al. Management of pulmonary contusion and flail chest: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73(5;Suppl.4):S351-361. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827019fd
16. Sziklavari Z, Molnar TF. Blast injures to the thorax. J Thorac Dis 2019;11(Suppl.2):S167-S171. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.11.106
17. Mansky R, Scher C. Thoracic trauma in military settings: a review of current practices and recommendations. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2019;32(2):227-33. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000694
18. Mackenzie IMJ, Tunnicliffe B. Blast injuries to the lung: epidemiology and management. Phil Trans R Soc 2011:B366295-299. DOI: 10.1098/ rstb.2010.025
19. De Lesquen H, Beranger F, Berbis J et al. Challenges in war-related thoracic injury faced by French military surgeons in Afghanistan (2009-2013). Injury 2016;47(9):1939-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.008
20. Ulusan A, Tunca IE, Sanli M, Isik AF. Single center experience of war-related thoracic injuries in Syria. Curr Thorac Surg 2023;8(2):91-5.
21. Abdoulaye MB, Ousseini A, Sani Rab, Sani Rach. Which Management for Gunshot Chest Wounds in a War Zone Hospital? Mediterranean BioMedical Journals. Adv Thor Dis 2021;(243). DOI: 10.15342/ atd.2021.243
22. Korol SO, Aslanian SA, Chelishvili AL et al. Clinical and instrumental features of diagnostics of combat surgical chest injury with tissue defects. World Med Biol 2023;85(3).
23. Ilić N, Petricević A, Tocilj J et al. Recovery of respiratory functional defects after war injuries to the chest. Croat Med J 1998;39(1):28-32.

For citation:Topolyanskaya S.V., Koshurnikov D.S., Antonova E.V., Kurzhos M.N., Pilyarova M.Kh., Rachina S.A., Lytkina K.A., Melkonyan G.G. Combat injuries of the lungs and pleura: an analysis of clinical cases. Clinical analysis in general medicine. 2024; 5 (11): 25–36 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2024.5.11.00513


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru