Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2024 > Vol 5, №12 (2024) > Pseudoinvasion in colon adenomas mimicking invasive carcinoma: diagnostic challenges and literature review

Pseudoinvasion in colon adenomas mimicking invasive carcinoma: diagnostic challenges and literature review

Alexander N. Verbovsky , Galiya R. Setdikova , Valentina E. Shikina , Alexey V. Semenkov

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Relevance. Epithelial pseudoinvasion of colorectal adenoma is morphologically characterized by the detection of glands in the submucosa.
The aim of the study was to increase awareness of submucosal pseudoinvasion for clinical purposes to prevent overly aggressive surgical treatment.
Materials and methods. The surgical materials of 147 patients with polypoid and laterally spreading neoplasms of the colon were analyzed. Cases of pseudoinvasion in colon adenomas were described in detail.
Results. Pseudoinvasion was detected in 3.4% (4/147) of cases. In 3 neoplasms, foci of severe dysplasia in the superficial sections were detected against the background of villous adenoma. In one case, a focus of epithelial prolapse was detected against the background of intramucosal carcinoma. Pseudoinvasion was detected in the muscularis mucosa and submucosal layer in the form of foci of a similar adenoma surrounded by fibrous stroma, the presence of extracellular mucus fields, elements of chronic inflammation with an admixture of segmented leukocytes, hemosiderin-rich macrophages, but without signs of stromal desmoplasia. Single glands were incomplete and uneven, with cytological signs of low-grade atypia. Unlike invasive carcinoma, tumor kidneys, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion were not detected. In all cases of resection of colon neoplasms with pseudoinvasion, severe fibrosis of the submucosal layer was observed, which led to non-radical resection (the vertical resection margin passed along the prolapse focus – R1). Despite non-radical resections, no signs of relapse were obtained during control endoscopic examinations. At the stage of endoscopic dissection, foci of epithelial prolapse are difficult to differentiate from true tumor invasion, which may determine an unjustified transition to traditional surgical intervention.
Conclusion. Pseudoinvasion in colon adenomas is a rare phenomenon. Endoscopic removal of such neoplasms is a difficult task due to severe fibrosis of the submucosal layer and is associated with a high probability of incomplete resection. However, the risks of recurrence after incomplete endoscopic resection are minimal.
Keywords: pseudoinvasion, colon adenoma, invasive colon carcinoma, colon neoplasia, endoscopic colon resection.

About the Author

Alexander N. Verbovsky 1 , Galiya R. Setdikova 1 , Valentina E. Shikina 1 , Alexey V. Semenkov 2

1 Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow, Russia

2 Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute (MONIKI), Moscow, Russia; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia

References

1. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М., 2022.
The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2021. Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. Moscow, 2022 (in Russian).
2. Vogel JD, Felder SI, Bhama AR et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colon Cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2022;65(2):148-77.
3. Johnson GGRJ, Helewa R, Moffatt DC et al. Colorectal polyp classification and management of complex polyps for surgeon endoscopists. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2023;66(5):E491-E498.
4. Logan RFA, Patnick J, Nickerson C et al. Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 2012;61(10):1439-46.
5. Facciorusso A, Antonino M, Di Maso M et al. Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms: Classification, therapy and follow-up. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2015;21(17):5149-57.
6. Baidoun F, Elshiwy K, Elkeraie Y et al. Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes. Current Drug Targets 2021;22(9):998-1009.
7. Dos Santos CEO, Pereira-Lima JC, Onófrio F de Q. Large Colorectal Lesions: Evaluation and Management. GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology 2016;23(4):197-207.
8. Zhu M, Xu Y, Yu L et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: Clinical outcomes and predictors of technical difficulty. Journal of Digestive Diseases 2022;23(4):228-36.
9. Saito Y, Fujii T, Kondo H et al. Endoscopic treatment for laterally spreading tumors in the colon. Endoscopy 2001;33(8):682-6.
10. Aust DE, Rüschoff J. Polyps of the colorectum: non-neoplastic and non-hamartomatous. Der Pathologe 2011;32(4): 297-302.
11. Shepherd NA, Griggs RKL. Bowel cancer screening-generated diagnostic conundrum of the century: pseudoinvasion in sigmoid colonic polyps. Modern Pathology 2015;28:S88-S94.
12. Griggs RKL, Novelli MR, Sanders DSA et al. Challenging diagnostic issues in adenomatous polyps with epithelial misplacement in bowel cancer screening: 5 years’ experience of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme Expert Board. Histopathology 2017;70(3):466-72.
13. Loughrey MB, Shepherd NA. The pathology of bowel cancer screening. Histopathology 2015;66(1):66-77. DOI: 10.1111/his.12530. PMID: 25123305
14. Panarelli NC, Somarathna T, Samowitz WS et al. Diagnostic Challenges Caused by Endoscopic Biopsy of Colonic Polyps: A Systematic Evaluation of Epithelial Misplacement With Review of Problematic Polyps From the Bowel Cancer Screening Program, United Kingdom. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 2016;40(8):1075-83.
15. Pascal RR, Hertzler G, Hunter S, Goldschmid S. Pseudoinvasion with high-grade dysplasia in a colonic adenoma. Distinction from adenocarcinoma The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 1990;14(7):
694-7.
16. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. Pseudo-carcinomatous invasion in adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum. J Clin Pathol 1973;26(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.26.1.25
17. Davila RE, Rajan E, Adler D et al. ASGE ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis, staging, and management of colorectal cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005;61(1):1-7.
18. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015;47(9):829-54.
19. Sato K, Ito S, Kitagawa T et al. Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surgical Endoscopy 2014;28(10):2959-65.
20. Mizushima T, Kato M, Iwanaga I et al. Technical difficulty according to location, and risk factors for perforation, in endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal tumors. Surgical Endoscopy 2015;29(1):
133-9.

For citation:Verbovsky A.N., Setdikova G.R., Shikina V.E., Semenkov A.V. Pseudoinvasion in colon adenomas mimicking invasive carcinoma: diagnostic challenges and literature review. Clinical review for general practice. 2024; 5 (12): 45–50 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2024.5.12.00536


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru