Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2024 > Vol 5, №4 (2024) > On the issue of the population’s attitude towards vaccinations and medical exemptions

On the issue of the population’s attitude towards vaccinations and medical exemptions

Oksana V. Moskalets

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Background. Despite the enormous successes that have been achieved in the fight against infectious diseases thanks to mass preventive vaccination, primarily the reduction of child mortality, anti-vaccination sentiment continues to spread among the population. One of the reasons is the unjustified medical exemptions from vaccinations, which were widely used in the past, and the shortcomings of taking into account adverse events after immunization.
Aim. Analysis of the grounds for medical objections to vaccination and the attitude of the population towards it.
Methods. A retrospective analysis of clinical and anamnestic data and the results of a survey of 108 adult patients referred for consultation with an allergist-immunologist to decide on the possibility of carrying out specific immunoprophylaxis was carried out.
Results. Previously issued medical exemptions from vaccinations were given to 92 patients (85%), with 53 patients (57.6%) based on intolerance to various drugs and only 14 (15.2%) due to adverse events after immunization, however, there was documentary evidence in only 2 patients. In 75 cases (68.5%) various allergic diseases were recorded, for which 27.2% of patients also received medical exemptions. After consultation, only 11 (10.2%) individuals had temporary contraindications against vaccination and 1 absolute contraindication (against ADS-M). The survey data showed that 38 respondents (35.1%) were confident that they would definitely develop an allergic reaction to the vaccine, 6 (6.2%) did not trust any vaccines, and another 9 people. (9.3%) were apprehensive because for one reason or another, they received a medical exemption in early childhood or their parents did not previously consent to vaccination. The main reasons for mistrust (using the example of SARS-CoV-2): fear of side effects (88.6%). insufficient knowledge (56.7%), low efficiency (43.8%), excess profits of pharmaceutical companies (35%), opinion of medical workers (24.7%), mandatory nature of vaccination (27.8%).
Conclusion. Unreasonable medical exemptions from vaccination, including in patients with allergic diseases, as well as the lack of appropriate medical documentation create a big problem for an objective assessment of the possibility of carrying out specific immunoprophylaxis in a particular patient. Anti-vaccination sentiments in society are quite widespread and often medical workers have a direct connection to this.
Keywords: vaccination, attitude to vaccination, refusal of vaccinations, medical exemption, allergy, vaccinations for epidemic indications, SARS-CоV-2, anti-vaccination movement.

About the Author

Oksana V. Moskalets 1

1 Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Брико Н.И., Фельдблюм И.В. Иммунопрофилактика инфекционных болезней в России: состояние и перспективы совершенствования. Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика. 2017;93(2):4-9. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-2-4-9
Briko N.I., Feldblum I.V. Immunoprophylaxis of infectious diseases in Russia: state and prospects of improvement. Epidemiology and vaccinal prevention. 2017;93(2):4-9. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2017-16-2-4-9 (in Russian).
2. Chan M, Elias C, Fauci A et al. Reaching everyone, everywhere with life-saving vaccines. Lancet 2017;389(10071):777-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30554-8
3. Peck M, Gacic-Dobo M, Diallo MS et al. Global routine vaccination coverage, 2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68(42):937-42. DOI: 0.15585/mmwr.mm6842a1
4. Бронский В.И., Толканец С.В., Бронская К.В. и др. Социально-психологические характеристики противников вакцинации в период новой коронавирусной. Медико-биологические проблемы жизнедеятельности. 2022;28(2):47-52.
Bronskiy V.I., Tolkanets S.V., Bronskaya K.V. et al. Socio-psychological characteristics of antivaccers during the period of a new coronavirus infection. Medical and biological problems of life. 2022;28(2):47-52 (in Russian).
5. Ullah I, Khan KS, Tahir MJ. Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas 2021;22(2):93-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.001
6. Демидова Т.В., Уфимцева Н.А. Коллизии вакцинопрофилактики в период пандемии. Медицинская сестра. 2021;23(4):31-5. DOI: 10.29296/25879979-2021-04-08
Demidova T.V., Ufimtseva N.A. Collisions of vaccine prevention during a pandemic. Nurse. 2021;23(4):31-5. DOI: 10.29296/25879979-2021-04-08 (in Russian).
7. Camargo CAJr, Zhou L. Multiple drug intolerance syndrome and multiple drug allergy syndrome: Epidemiology and association with anxiety and depression. Allergy 2018;73(10):2012-2023. DOI: 10.1111/ all.13440
8. Ye G, Baldwin DS, Hou R. Anxiety in asthma: a systematic review and metha-analysis. Psychol Med 2021;51(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1017/ S0033291720005097
9. Плакида А.В., Брико Н.И., Намазова-Баранова Л.С. и др. Повышение приверженности населения вакцинации: оценка и системный подход к реализации. Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика. 2022;21(3):4-26. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2022-21-3-4-26
Plakida A.V., Briko N.I., Namazova-Baranova L.S. et al. Increasing population adherence to vaccination: evaluation and a systematic approach to Implementation. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2022;21(3):4-26. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2022-21-3-4-26 (in Russian).
10. Hasanzad M, Namazi H, Larijani B. COVID-19 anti-vaccine attitude and hesitancy. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2022;22(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1007/s40200-022-01018-y
11. Брико Н.И., Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Лобзин Ю.В. и др. Совершенствование мониторинга неблагоприятных событий поствакцинального периода (в порядке дискуссии). Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика. 2016;15(6):95-101. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2016-15-6-95-101
Briko N.I., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Lobzin Ju.V. et al. Improving the monitoring of adverse events of the post-vaccination period (in the order of discussion). Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2016;15(6):95-10. DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2016-15-6-95-101 (in Russian).
12. Чернова Т.М., Тимченко В.Н., Мыскина Н.А. Причины нарушения графика вакцинации детей раннего возраста. Педиатрия. 2019;10(3):31-6. DOI: 10.17816/PED10331-36
Chernova T.M., Timchenko V.N., Myskina N.A. The reasons for the violation of the vaccination schedule for young children. Pediatrician. 2019;10(3):31-6. DOI: 10.17816/PED10331-36 (in Russian).
13. Mills AR, Jadad K, Wilson J. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental beliefs and attitudes toward childhood vaccination identifies common barriers to vaccination. Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(11):1081-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.002
14. Мокеев А.Г., Куршина М.В., Капишников П.А. и др. Отношение родителей детей дошкольного возраста к вакцинации по эпидемическим показаниям и причины отказа от прививок. Вестник «Биомедицина и социология». 2023;8(2):66-71. DOI: 10.26787/nydha-2618-8783-2023-8-2-66-71
Mokeev A.G., Kurshina M.V., Kapishnikov P.A. et al. The attitude of parents of prescool children to vaccination according to epidemic indications and the reasons for refusing vacinations. Bulletin "Biomedicine and Sociology. 2023;8(2):66-71. DOI: 10.26787/nydha-2618-8783-2023-8-2-66-71 (in Russian).

For citation:Moskalets O.V. On the issue of the population’s attitude towards vaccinations and medical exemptions. Clinical review for general practice. 2024; 5 (4): 95–99 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2024.5.4.00425


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru