Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2024 > Vol 5, №5 (2024) > Back pain. Results of a non-interventional study of using Ambenium® parenteral in routine clinical practice

Back pain. Results of a non-interventional study of using Ambenium® parenteral in routine clinical practice

Dmitry S. Kurilchenko , Maya A. Kazakova , Yulia G. Kupryashkina , Maria V. Feoktistova , Sergey M. Kryzhanovskiy , Elena I. Chukanova

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Aim: to estimate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Ambenium® parenteral [phenylbutazone sodium 400 mg and lidocaine hydrochloride 4 mg] used for treatment of patients with low back pain. 
Methods. A total of 100 patients with low back pain (LBP), who received a single intramuscular injection of Ambenium® parenteral, were included in the study. The follow-up period was 3 days. The change in pain severity on VAS (mm) was selected as a primary outcome measure for efficacy. The pain syndrome severity was estimated before administration of the drug (visit 1) and 4, 6, 8 and 12 h after the drug administration, as well as during visits 2 (day 2) and 3 (day 4). The McGill Pain Questionnaire, muscle syndrome index (MSI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire pain estimates were used as the secondary diagnostic criteria. The percentage of patients with the positive response relative to baseline (the decrease in pain severity on VAS by more than 50%) was also determined.
Results. The dynamics of the primary efficacy measure (pain severity on VAS) was as follows: 7.4 ± 0.92 cm (mean ± standard deviation) during visit 1, 5.6 ± 1.49 cm after 2 h, 4.6 ± 1.74 cm after 4 h, 3.0 ± 1.79 cm after 8 h; the VAS score was 2.3 ± 1.70 cm after 12 h (р<0.001). The share of patients who responded to therapy (with the decrease in pain severity on VAS by more than 50% relative to baseline) was 84% [95% CI: 75.0 – 91.0] 24 h after the first administration, 94% during visit 3 [95% CI: 87.0 – 98.0], р<0.001. The secondary efficacy criteria (muscle syndrome index and McGill Pain Questionnaire score) showed significant positive dynamics (р<0.001). No systemic adverse events were reported. 
Conclusion. The study showed that a single intramuscular injection of Ambenium® parenteral was an efficient, well-tolerated and safe treatment option for low back pain. Administration of a single drug dose makes it possible to ensure a significant clinical effect reflected in the pain severity decrease and restoration of the patient’s motor activity.
Keywords: back pain, treatment, ambenium parenteral, phenylbutazone, lidocaine.

About the Author

Dmitry S. Kurilchenko 1 , Maya A. Kazakova 2 , Yulia G. Kupryashkina 3 , Maria V. Feoktistova 4 , Sergey M. Kryzhanovskiy 5 , Elena I. Chukanova 6

1 Central Clinical Hospital with polyclinic of the Office of the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; Medical Research Center "KoMed" (LLC "LR"), Moscow, Russia

2 City Polyclinic No 23, Branch No 1, Moscow, Russia; Diagnostics LLC, Moscow, Russia

3 Diagnostic Center No 3, Branch No 2 (City Polyclinic No 133), Moscow, Russia

4 Demikhov City Clinical Hospital, Moscow, Russia

5 Medical Research Center "KoMed" (LLC "LR"), Moscow, Russia; Central State Medical Academy of the Office of the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

6 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Traeger A, Buchbinder R, Harris I, Maher C. Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care. CMAJ 2017;(189):E1386-95. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170527
2. Low da Silva OT, Joaquim AF, Patel AA. Management of Low Back Pain. In: Joaquim A, Ghizoni E, Tedeschi H, Ferreira M (eds). Fundamentals of Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17649-5_13
3. Refshauge KM, Maher CG. Low back pain investigations and prognosis: a review. Br J Sports Med 2006;40:494-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm. 2004.016659
4. Corp N, Mansell G, Stynes S et al. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: a systematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain 2021;25:275-95. DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1679
5. Инструкция по медицинскому применению лекарственного препарата АМБЕНИУМ® парентерал. Номер РУ ЛП-006040. Эл. ресурс: https://grls.minzdrav.gov.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid= 9d406fac-ebbf-40a3-936f-88a8783d8619
Instructions for the medical use of the drug AMBENIUM parenteral. RU LP number-006040. E-resource: https://grls.minzdrav.gov.ru/ Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=9d406fac-ebbf-40a3-936f-88a8783 d8619 (in Russian).
6. Лукьянчук Е. Выбор нестероидных противовоспалительных препаратов для купирования острой боли при ревматических заболеваниях. Український ревматологічний журнал. 2015;(2):29-30.
Lukyanchuk E. The choice of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the relief of acute pain in rheumatic diseases. Ukrainian Rheumatology journal. 2015;(2):29-30 (in Russian).
7. ICH Topic E 6 (R1) Guideline for Good Clinical Prac-tice. URL:http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en.pdf
8. Guideline on the clinical development of medicinal products intended for the treatment of pain/15 December 2016 EMA/CHMP/970057/ 2011 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Microsoft Word – Guideline on the clinical development of medicinal products intended for the treatment of pain (europa.eu).
9. Gélinas C, Puntillo KA, Levin P, et al: The Behavior Pain Assessment Tool for critically illadults: A validation study in 28 countries. Pain 2017;158:811-21.
10. Кузьменко В.В., Фокин В.А., Соков Е.Л. и др. Психологические методы количественной оценки боли. Советская медицина. 1986;10:44-8.
Kuzmenko V.V., Fokin V.A., Sokov E.L., etc. Psychological methods for quantifying pain. Soviet medicine. 1986;10:44-8.
11. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of low-back pain: part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine. 1983 Mar 1;8(2):145-50.
12. Салихов И.Г., Хабиров Р.А., Попелянский Я.Ю. Клинические проявления поражения скелетных мышц при ревматоидном артрите. Ревматология. 1987;(1):43.
Salikhov, I. G., Khabirov R. A., Popelyansky Ya. Yu. Clinical manifestations of skeletal muscle damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 1987;(1):43.
13. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983;67(6):361-370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
14. Vlaeyen JW, Maher CG, Wiech K et al. Low back pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;(4):52. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-018-0052-1
15. Varrassi G, Coaccioli S, De-Andrés J, et al. Expert consensus on clinical use of an orally administered dexketoprofen plus tramadol fixed-dose combination in moderate-to-severe acute pain: a Delphi study. Adv Ther. 2019, 36:3174-85. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-01096-0
16. Varrassi G, Hanna M, Macheras G et al. Multimodal analgesia in moderate-to-severe pain: a role for a new fixed combination of dexketoprofen and tramadol. Curr Med Res Opin 2017, 33:1165-73. DOI: 10.1080/ 03007995.2017.1310092
17. Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci 2016;(11):114. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
18. Василюк В.Б., Фарапонова М.В., Сыраева Г.И. Выбор НПВП для лечения острой и хронической боли у пациентов с ревматоидным артритом на амбулаторно-поликлиническом этапе. Русский медицинский журнал. 2020;28(12):30-4.
Vasilyuk V.B., Faraponova M.V., Suraeva G.I. The choice of NSAIDs for the treatment of acute and chronic pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at the outpatient stage. Russian Medical Journal. 2020;28(12):30-4.

For citation:Kurilchenko D.S., Kazakova M.A., Kupryashkina Yu.G., Feoktistova M.V., Kryzhanovskiy S.M., Chukanova E.I. Back pain. Results of a non-interventional study of using Ambenium® parenteral in routine clinical practice. Clinical analysis in general medicine. 2024; 5 (5): 21–26 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2024.5.5.00401


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru