Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2025 > Vol 6, №5 (2025) > Comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in functional dyspepsia: a real-world retrospective study

Comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in functional dyspepsia: a real-world retrospective study

Sanjay Kumar Bandyopadhyay , B. Ravi Shankar , Omesh Goyal

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Background. Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent gastric neuromuscular disorder affecting approximately 20% of the global population, with significant economic implications, particularly in India, where prevalence rates vary between 7.6% and 49%. Characterized by epigastric pain, early satiety, and postprandial fullness, FD lacks identifiable anatomical abnormalities, complicating treatment. Prokinetic agents like Itopride and Acotiamide are commonly used, but face variability in treatment.
Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Itopride versus Acotiamide in managing FD symptoms in a real-world Indian context.
Methods. This retrospective study analysed prospectively maintained data (from January to August 2024) across three sites in India. Seventy-nine patients (57 on Itopride and 22 on Acotiamide) were assessed for symptom improvement at 4 and 8-weeks post-treatment initiation, using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM). Symptom severity grades were compared between treatment groups using the Fischer exact or Chi-square test. Results: The mean age of FD patients was 45.59 years, with 46.8% male and demographic parameters were similar across both treatment groups. Itopride treatment significantly reduced symptom severity for epigastric pain, burning, early satiation, and postprandial fullness (p≤0.05) compared to the baseline, while Acotiamide showed non-significant improvements at both 4 and 8 weeks. Between treatment, comparison found fewer high symptom severity grades with Itopride than Acotiamide treatment (e.g. 1.75% vs. 13.64%, p=0.003, for epigastric pain, 8 weeks treatment). Also, after 8 weeks, 61.4% of Itopride patients reported symptom resolution, contrasted with 31.82% in the Acotiamide group. Adverse events were mild and infrequent in both groups, indicating comparable safety profiles.
Conclusion. This study provides valuable real-world evidence supporting the use of Itopride as a preferred treatment option for FD in India. Further research is warranted to establish long-term efficacy and safety across diverse populations.
Keywords: functional dyspepsia, Itopride, Acotiamide, prokinetic agents, symptom severity grades.

About the Author

Sanjay Kumar Bandyopadhyay , B. Ravi Shankar , Omesh Goyal
Sanjay Kumar Bandyopadhyay1, B. Ravi Shankar2, Omesh Goyal3 

1 Apollo Clinic Hindmotor, Hooghly, West Bengal, India; 
2 Yashoda Hospitals, Secunderabad, Telangana, India; 
3 Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India goyalomesh@yahoo.com

References

1. Ford AC, Mahadeva S, Carbone MF et al. Functional dyspepsia. Lancet 2020;396(10263):1689-702. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30469-4
2. Goyal O et al. Prevalence, overlap, and risk factors for Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorders among college students in northern India. Indian J Gastroenterol 2021;40(2):144-53. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-020-01106-y
3. Sud R et al. Dyspepsia – The Indian perspective: A cross sectional study on demographics and treatment patterns of Dyspepsia from across India (Power 1.0 study). J Assoc Physicians India 2023;71(4):36-46. DOI: 10.5005/japi-11001-0231
4. Goyal O, Nohria S, Batta S et al. Low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet versus traditional dietary advice for functional dyspepsia: a randomized controlled trial.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;37(2):301-9. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15694
5. Goyal O, Goyal P, Kishore H et al. Quality of life in Indian patients with functional dyspepsia: Translation and validation of the Hindi version of Short-Form Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Indian J Gastroenterol 2022;41(4):378-88. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-021-01233-0
6. Sander GB et al. Influence of Organic and Functional Dyspepsia on Work Productivity: The HEROES-DIP Study. Value Health 2011;14(5):S126–S129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.021
7. Mahadeva S. Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia: A global perspective. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12(17):2661. DOI: 10.3748/wjg. v12.i17.2661
8. Quigley EMM. Prokinetics in the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015;21(3):330-6. DOI: 10.5056/jnm15094
9. Maneerattanaporn M, Chang L, Chey WD. Emerging Pharmacological Therapies for the Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2011;40(1):223-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2010.12.002
10. CDSCO. Itopride. 2002. Available at: https://cdscoonline.gov.in/CDSCO/Drugs
11. Huang X. Itopride therapy for functional dyspepsia: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18(48):7371. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7371
12. Shrestha DB et al. Acotiamide and Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2021. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20532
13. Yang YJ et al. Prokinetics for the treatment of functional dyspepsia: Bayesian network meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2017;17(1):83. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0639-0
14. Rentz AM et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM) in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders. Qual Life Res 2004;13(10):1737-49. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-9567-x
15. U.S. FDA. Information about Domperidone. Available at: https://www.fda. gov/drugs/information-drug-class/information-about-domperidone
16. CDSCO. Grant of permission to undertake Phase III clinical trial of New Drug Acotiamide Hydrochloride 300mg tablet. Govt. of India, 2020. Available at: https://cdsco.gov.in/opencms/resources/UploadCDSCOWeb/2018/UploadCTApprovals/Acotiamide%20300%20mg%20Tablet-Synokem.pdf
17. Holtmann G, Talley NJ, Liebregts T et al. A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Itopride in Functional Dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 2006;354(8):832-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa052639
18. Talley NJ, Tack J, Ptak T et al. Itopride in functional dyspepsia: results of two phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Gut 2008;57(6):740-6. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2007.132449
19. Jovanovic A, Miller-Hodges E, Castriota F et al. A systematic literature review on the health-related quality of life and economic burden of Fabry disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024;19(1):181. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03131-y

Портал CON-MED.RU:
https://con-med.ru/magazines/klinicheskiy_razbor_v_obshchey_meditsine/klinicheskiy_razbor_v_obshchey_meditsine-05-2025/sravnitelnyy_analiz_iskhodov_lecheniya_funktsionalnoy_dispepsii_itopridom_i_akotiamidom_retrospektiv/

For citation: Bandyopadhyay S.K., Shankar B.R., Goyal O. Comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in functional dyspepsia: a real-world retrospective study. Clinical review for general practice. 2025; 6 (5): 18–27 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2025.6.5.00607


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

Scopus
doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru