Abstract
Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Itopride versus Acotiamide in managing FD symptoms in a real-world Indian context.
Methods. This retrospective study analysed prospectively maintained data (from January to August 2024) across three sites in India. Seventy-nine patients (57 on Itopride and 22 on Acotiamide) were assessed for symptom improvement at 4 and 8-weeks post-treatment initiation, using the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM). Symptom severity grades were compared between treatment groups using the Fischer exact or Chi-square test. Results: The mean age of FD patients was 45.59 years, with 46.8% male and demographic parameters were similar across both treatment groups. Itopride treatment significantly reduced symptom severity for epigastric pain, burning, early satiation, and postprandial fullness (p≤0.05) compared to the baseline, while Acotiamide showed non-significant improvements at both 4 and 8 weeks. Between treatment, comparison found fewer high symptom severity grades with Itopride than Acotiamide treatment (e.g. 1.75% vs. 13.64%, p=0.003, for epigastric pain, 8 weeks treatment). Also, after 8 weeks, 61.4% of Itopride patients reported symptom resolution, contrasted with 31.82% in the Acotiamide group. Adverse events were mild and infrequent in both groups, indicating comparable safety profiles.
Conclusion. This study provides valuable real-world evidence supporting the use of Itopride as a preferred treatment option for FD in India. Further research is warranted to establish long-term efficacy and safety across diverse populations.
Keywords: functional dyspepsia, Itopride, Acotiamide, prokinetic agents, symptom severity grades.
For citation: Bandyopadhyay S.K., Shankar B.R., Goyal O. Comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes of Itopride and Acotiamide in functional dyspepsia: a real-world retrospective study. Clinical review for general practice. 2025; 6 (5): 18–27 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2025.6.5.00607
All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.




