Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2025 > Vol 6, №7 (2025) > Markers of the effectiveness of nutritional support in surgical patients (literature review)

Markers of the effectiveness of nutritional support in surgical patients (literature review)

Tatiana N. Kuzmina , Darya V. Rubanova , Olga A. Smirnova , Alyona V. Sergeeva , Anastasia V. Timoshchenko , Elena V. Vinnitskaya

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

The review article details the possibilities of assessing nutritional status in surgical patients. Nutritional status assessment should be carried out comprehensively to determine the indications and effectiveness of nutritional support: starting with screening, which takes into account clinical data, using scales and indices including blood markers, anthropometry, instrumental techniques, functional tests, which allows you to understand the degree of risk, the type of nutritional disorders and its reversibility, predict the response to nutritional support, possible complications and consequences of surgery. In the perioperative period, timely detection of latent protein and energy deficiency, proper provision of basic nutrition and fluid requirements, is especially important to prevent complications associated with nutritional deficiencies. The algorithm of applying the techniques in assessing the effectiveness of nutritional support at different stages of the perioperative period is not an easy task, and it should be noted that the tactics of nutritional support in the perioperative period among the international medical communities does not have a single approach. The article discusses in detail the screenings that identify the nutritional risks of complications and choose the tactics of monitoring or treating the patient; scales that determine the severity of nutritional deficiencies; indexes and scales that include additional blood markers and assess the severity of nutritional deficiencies. The possibility of introducing new markers of nutritional deficiency, such as prealbumin, irisin, transferrin, retinol-binding protein, which have no routine use, except for generally accepted standard indicators, will contribute to the correct assessment of the severity and effectiveness of therapy in surgical patients. Thus, it is necessary to take into account and use the most sensitive markers in various clinical situations, this will optimize the approach to patient treatment and achieve decent results. 
Keywords: nutritional status, sarcopenia, Nutritional Risk Screening NRS-2002, Nutritional Risk Index to Buzby, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Naples Prognostic Score, markers of nutritional deficiency, retinol binding protein, рerioperative nutritional support.

About the Author

Tatiana N. Kuzmina 1 , Darya V. Rubanova 1 , Olga A. Smirnova 1 , Alyona V. Sergeeva 1 , Anastasia V. Timoshchenko 1 , Elena V. Vinnitskaya 1

1 Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center, Moscow, Russia

References

1. Bozzetti F, Mariani L, Lo Vullo S, et al. The nutritional risk in oncology: A study of 1453 cancer outpatients. Support. Care Cancer. 2012;20: 1919-28. 
2. Marshall KM, Loeliger J, Nolte L, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and impact on clinical outcomes in cancer services: A comparison of two time points. Clin Nutr. 2019 Apr;38(2):644-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu. 2018.04.007 
3. Hébuterne X, Lemarié E, Michallet M, et al. Prevalence of Malnutrition and Current Use of Nutrition Support in Patients with Cancer. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2014;38:196-204. 
4. Злокачественные опухоли [спецвыпуск журнала]: Практические рекомендации Российского общества клинической онкологии. Лекарственное лечение злокачественных опухолей. Под ред. В.М. Моисеенко. М.: Общероссийская общественная организация «Российское общество клинической онкологии», 2022. 288 с. URL: https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/issue/view/62 Malignant Tumors [special issue of the journal]: Practical recommendations of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology. Drug treatment of malignant tumors. Ed. V.M. Moiseenko. Moscow: All-Russian public organization “Russian Society of Clinical Oncology”, 2022. 288 p. URL: https://www.malignanttumors.org/jour/issue/view/62 (in Russian). 
5. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Nutrition in Cancer Patients. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:11-48. 
6. Braga M. Perioperative immunonutrition and gut function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012 Sep;15(5):485-8. DOI: 10.1097/MCO. 0b013e3283567d8f 
7. Moore FA. Effects of immune-enhancing diets on infectious morbidity and multiple organ failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):S36-42; discussion S42-3. DOI: 10.1177/ 014860710102500209 
8. August DA, Huhmann MB; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):472-500. DOI: 10.1177/0148607109341804 
9. Barazzoni R, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, et al. Guidance for assessment of the muscle mass phenotypic criterion for the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) diagnosis of malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2022 Jun;41(6):1425-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Apr 19. 10. Лейдерман И.Н., Грицан А.И., Заболотских И.Б. и др. Периоперационная нутритивная поддержка. Методические рекомендации Федерации анестезиологов и реаниматологов. Вестник интенсивной терапии им. А.И. Салтанова. 2021;(4):7-20. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-7-20 Leiderman I.N., Gritsan A.I., Zabolotskikh I.B., et al. Perioperative nutritional support. Clinical practice recommendations of the national “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists”. Annals of Critical Care. 2022;(4):7-20. DOI: 10.21320/1818-474X-2021-4-7-20 (in Russian). 
11. Cortes R, Yañez AM, Capitán-Moyano L, et al. Evaluation of different screening tools for detection of malnutrition in hospitalised patients. J Clin Nurs. 2024 Dec;33(12):4759-71. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17170. Epub 2024 Apr 17. 
12. Cortés-Aguilar R, Malih N, Abbate M, et al. Validity of nutrition screening tools for risk of malnutrition among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2024 May;43(5):1094-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 15. 
13. Sahli L, Hagenbuch N, Ballmer PE, et al. NRS-2002 components, nutritional score and severity of disease score, and their association with hospital length of stay and mortality. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Jul 14;151:w20517. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2021.20517 
14. Torbahn G, Strauss T, Sieber CC, et al. Nutritional status according to the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) as potential prognostic factor for health and treatment outcomes in patients with cancer – a systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):594. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07052-4 
15. Susetyowati S, Sholikhati AS, Cahyaningrum DK, et al. Comparison of Tools for Nutritional Assessment and Screening of Hospitalized Patients: A study on Surgical Patients. Medeni Med J. 2023 Mar 28;38(1):70-7. DOI: 10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.64554 
16. Rothenberg E, Tsagari A, Erickson N, et al. Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) for the diagnosis of malnutrition - a framework for consistent dietetic practice. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024 Apr;60:261-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 17. 
17. Ma X, Zou W, Sun Y. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 20;11:770894. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.770894 
18. Бастриков О.Ю., Харламова У.В., Захарова А.И. и др. Оценка нутритивного статуса у пациентов с симптомами сердечной недостаточности. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2020;5(4):14-20. DOI: 10.29413/ABS.2020-5.4.2 Bastrikov O.Yu., Kharlamova U.V., Zakharova A.I., et al. Assessment of Nutritive Status in Patients with Symptoms of Heart Failure. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2020;5(4):14-20. DOI: 10.29413/ABS.2020-5.4.2 (in Russian). 
19. Poulia KA, Yannakoulia M, Karageorgou D, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of six nutritional screening tools to predict malnutrition in the elderly. Clin Nutr. 2012 Jun;31(3):378-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.11. 017. Epub 2011 Dec 17. 
20. Galizia G, Lieto E, Auricchio A, et al. Naples Prognostic Score, Based on Nutritional and Inflammatory Status, is an Independent Predictor of Long-term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Dec;60(12):1273-84. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000961 
21. Ветчинникова О.Н., Пичугина И.С. Белково-энергетическая недостаточность у больных на перитонеальном диализе: факторы риска развития и диагностика. Клиническая нефрология. 2015;(1):55-63. Vetchinnikova O.N., Pichugina I.S. Protein-energy malnutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients: risk factors and diagnosis. Clinical Nephrology. 2015;(1):55-63 (in Russian). 
22. Feng JF, Wang L, Yang X. The preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score is a useful predictor in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2021 Dec 1;21(6):773-81. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.5666 
23. Stoppe C, Wendt S, Mehta NM, et al. Crit Care. 2020 Aug 12;24(1):499. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03208-7 
24. Pardo E, Jabaudon M, Godet T, et al. Dynamic assessment of prealbumin for nutrition support effectiveness in critically ill patients. Clin Nutr. 2024 Jun;43(6):1343-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.04.015. Epub 2024 Apr 15. 
25. Pisprasert V, Shantavasinkul PC, Rattanachaiwong S, et al. Moderately high-protein enteral formula improved retinol-binding protein in tube-fed patients: A multicentre open study. Nutr Health. 2017 Sep;23(3):203-9. DOI: 10.1177/0260106017729959 
26. Linden MA, Freitas RGBON, Teles LOS, et al. Transthyretin and Nutritional Status in Critically Ill Adults on Parenteral Nutrition: A Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients. 2024 Jul 27;16(15):2448. DOI: 10.3390/nu16152448 
27. Bañuls C, de Marañon AM, Veses S, et al. Malnutrition impairs mitochondrial function and leukocyte activation. Nutr J. 2019;18(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-019-0514-7 
28. Addo OY, Yu EX, Williams AM, et al. Evaluation of Hemoglobin Cutoff Levels to Define Anemia Among Healthy Individuals. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):е2119123. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19123 
29. Yasuda M, Tachi T, Fukuta M. Nutritional factors affecting length of hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Pharmazia. 2019;74(12):760-2. DOI: 10.1691/ph.2019.9650 
30. Wang Z, Peng W, Zhang J, et al. Effect of Early Enteral Nutrition under the ERAS Model on Gastrointestinal and Immune Function Recovery in P
atients Undergoing Gastric Tumor Surgery. Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(6):1147-54. DOI: 10.62713/aic.3738 
31. Haenggi E, Kaegi-Braun N, Wunderle C, et al. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) – A new nutritional biomarker to assess nutritional risk and response to nutritional therapy? Clin Nutr. 2024 Feb;43(2):575-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.001 
32. Bozzetti F. Evolving concepts on perioperative nutrition of sarcopenic cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 May;50(5):106748. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.008 
33. Berardi G, Antonelli G, Colasanti M, et al. Association of Sarcopenia and Body Composition With Short-term Outcomes After Liver Resection for Malignant Tumors. JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov;155(11):e203336. 
34. Takagi A, Hawke P, Tokuda S, et al. Serum carnitine as a biomarker of sarcopenia and nutritional status in preoperative gastrointestinal cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Feb;13(1):287-95. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12906 
35. Shen XD, Wang X, Zheng ZJ, et al. The differential effects of sarcopenia and cachexia on overall survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients following pancreatectomy: a retrospective study based on a large population. Cancer Med. 2023;12:10438-48. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5779 
36. Tosato M, Marzetti E, Cesari M, et al. Measurement of muscle mass in sarcopenia: from imaging to biochemical markers. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(1):19-27. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-016-0717-0 
37. Planella-Farrugia C, Comas F, Sabater-Masdeu M, et al. Circulating Irisin and Myostatin as Markers of Muscle Strength and Physical Condition in Elderly Subjects. Front Physiol. 2019 Jul 10;10:871. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00871 
38. Cho MR, Lee S, Song SK. A Review of Sarcopenia Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment and Future Direction. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 May 9;37(18):e146. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e146 
39. Di Vincenzo O, Marra M, Di Gregorio A, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) -derived phase angle in sarcopenia: A systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3052-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.048 40. Revoredo S, Del Fabbro E. Hepatocellular carcinoma and sarcopenia: a narrative review. Ann Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;12(6):1295-309.

For citation: Kuzmina T.N., Rubanova D.V., Smirnova O.A., Sergeeva A.V., Timoshchenko A.V., Vinnitskaya E.V. Markers of the effectiveness of nutritional support in surgical patients (literature review). Clinical review for general practice. 2025; 6 (7): 81–86 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2025.6.7.00648


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

Scopus
doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru