Clinical review for general practice

ISSN (Print) 2713-2552
ISSN (Online) 2782-5671
  • Home
  • about
  • archives
  • contacts
left
FULLSCREEN > Archive > 2026 > Vol 7, №2 (2026) > Potential damage to the ovarian reserve during laparoscopic electrocoagulation of endometrioid cysts and benign ovarian cysts

Potential damage to the ovarian reserve during laparoscopic electrocoagulation of endometrioid cysts and benign ovarian cysts

Anastasia E. Averyanova , Shanmugaraj Kulanthaivel , Lada A. Alekseeva , Daniil A. Sokur , Ekaterina I. Tkachenko , Elizaveta A. Derbunova , Varvara S. Murashova

For citation:


  • Abstract
  • About the Author
  • References

Abstract

Introduction. Endometrioid ovarian cysts (endometriomas) are one of the most common clinical manifestations of endometriosis with a prevalence of 17 to 44% in the population. Laparoscopic cystectomy is currently recognized as the "gold standard" of surgical correction. However, in the last decade, a significant amount of data has been accumulating indicating potential iatrogenic damage to the ovarian reserve during this intervention.
Aim. To carry out a systematic analysis of modern scientific data assessing the effect of laparoscopic cystectomy using bipolar electrocoagulation on the parameters of ovarian reserve in patients of reproductive age with endometrioid and other benign ovarian cysts, as well as to conduct a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of alternative methods of hemostasis.
Materials and methods. A systematic review of the literature published in the period from 2014 to 2024 was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The search criteria included combinations of keywords: "ovarian reserve", "anti-Mullerian hormone", "AMH", "endometrioma", "laparoscopic cystectomy", "bipolar coagulation", "hemostatic suture", "PlasmaJet". Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts, and meta-analyses were selected.
Conclusion. According to relevant studies, laparoscopic cystectomy of endometriomas is associated with a statistically significant decrease in serum concentrations of anti-Muller hormone in the postoperative period, amounting to 30–60% of the baseline level. The use of bipolar coagulation correlates with the most pronounced suppression of ovarian reserve in comparison with alternative methods. The use of hemostatic sutures and plasma coagulation (PlasmaJet) demonstrates significantly better indicators of follicular pool preservation. Laparoscopic cystectomy using bipolar electrocoagulation has a deterministic negative effect on the ovarian reserve. Reducing the risk of iatrogenic damage requires the introduction of organ-preserving surgical techniques into clinical practice, among which priority is given to hemostatic sutures. Preoperative awareness of potential risks and an objective assessment of the ovarian reserve are mandatory components of the management of patients of reproductive age.
Keywords: ovarian reserve, anti-muller hormone, endometrioid cyst, laparoscopic cystectomy, bipolar coagulation, fertility.

About the Author

Anastasia E. Averyanova 1 , Shanmugaraj Kulanthaivel 2 , Lada A. Alekseeva 1 , Daniil A. Sokur 1 , Ekaterina I. Tkachenko 1 , Elizaveta A. Derbunova 3 , Varvara S. Murashova 1

1 Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russia

2 Narayan Multidisciplinary Hospital, Kavindapadi, Erode, India

3 Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, RussiaVernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russia

References

1. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Koga K et al. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382(13):1244-56. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1810764
2. Muzii L, Bianchi A, Crocè C et al. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the stripping technique a tissue-sparing procedure? Fertil Steril 2002;77(4):609-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03203-4
3. Somigliana E, Busnelli A, Benaglia L et al. The enigmatic question of the effect of endometrioma and its surgical treatment on ovarian reserve. Reprod Sci 2021;28(6):1547-55. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00444-8
4. Muzii L, Achilli C, Bergamini V et al. Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicentre RCT. Hum Reprod 2016;31(2):339-44. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev308
5. Saito A, Ergun E, Kaya C et al. Thermal tissue damage caused by ultrasonic coagulation and bipolar coagulation in laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(6S):S1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.005
6. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Auber M et al. Ovarian endometrioma ablation using plasma energy versus cystectomy: a step toward better preservation of the ovarian parenchyma. Fertil Steril 2018;110(5):964-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.017
7. Raffi F, Amer S. The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102(9):3143-53. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-00568
8. Taniguchi F, Sakamoto Y, Yabuta Y et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome and decline of anti-Müllerian hormone after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometrioma. Reprod Med Biol 2015;14(4):173-9. DOI: 10.1007/s12522-015-0207-7
9. Alborzi S, Foroughinia L, Kumar PV et al. A comparison of the impact of laparoscopic cystectomy and hemostatic methods on ovarian reserve in patients with endometrioma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020;302(4):969-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05683-3
10. Younis JS, Shapso N, Fleming R et al. Impact of unilateral versus bilateral ovarian endometrioma on pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2021;27(6):1026-45. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmab025
11. Lee D, Kim SK, Lee JR, Jee BC. Correlation between the coagulated area of ovarian tissue and the decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone level after laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy. Hum Reprod 2022;37(3):450-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab282
12. Saridogan E, Becker CM, Feki A et al. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2021;2021(4):hoab052. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab052
13. Stochino-Loi E, Darwish B, Mircea O et al. Does preoperative antimüllerian hormone level influence postoperative pregnancy rate in women with surgery for bilateral endometriomas? Fertil Steril 2022;117(3):636-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.031
14. Uccella S, Cromi A, Casarin J et al. Laparoscopy for endometriosis: a long-term follow-up of patients undergoing conservative surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26(1):165-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.04.021
15. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Auber M et al. Antimüllerian hormone level and endometrioma ablation surgery. Fertil Steril 2018;110(5):964-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.017
16. Koo YJ, Kwon YS, Kim ML et al. Decline of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometrioma compared with other benign ovarian cysts. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2021;64(5):462-71. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.21114
17. Hirokawa W, Iwase A, Goto M et al. The post-operative decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone correlates with the bilaterality and severity of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2020;35(2):363-71. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez292
18. Litta P, D'Agostino G, Conte L et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone trend after laparoscopic surgery in women with ovarian endometrioma. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021;37(1):63-6. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1770726.
19. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022;2022(2):hoac009. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac009
20. Alkatout I, Mettler L, Beteta C et al. Combined surgical and hormone therapy for endometriosis is the most effective treatment: prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20(4):473-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.019
21. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G et al. Plasma energy for tissue dissection in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28(1):16-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.005
22. Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Mariani G et al. Ovarian surgery for bilateral endometriomas influences age at menopause. Hum Reprod 2019;34(1):72-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey335
23. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy. Fertil Steril 2019;112(6):1023-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.013
24. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Endometriosis and stem cells: the future of endometriosis treatment. Fertil Steril 2021;115(3):537-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.011
25. Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev 2009;30(5):465-93. DOI: 10.1210/er.2009-0006
26. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20(3):370-85. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmt062
27. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E et al. Surgical outcomes after laparoscopic management of endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022;29(1):62-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.004
28. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Endometriosis and medical therapy: from progestogens to progesterone resistance to GnRH antagonists. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(3):1335. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031335
29. Chang HJ, Han SH, Lee JR et al. Impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve: serial changes of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2016;106(5):1131-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.009
30. Zhang Y, Lin J, Zhai X, Sun X. Impact of laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023;21(1):15. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01065-x
31. Senapati S, Barnhart KT. Managing endometriosis-associated infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023;66(1):22-35. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000755

For citation:Averyanova A.E., Kulanthaivel S., Alekseeva L.A., Sokur D.A., Tkachenko E.I., Derbunova E.A., Murashova V.S. Potential damage to the ovarian reserve during laparoscopic electrocoagulation of endometrioid cysts and benign ovarian cysts. Clinical review for general practice. 2026; 7 (2): 101–103 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47407/kr2026.7.2.00775


All accepted articles publish licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Ethics
  • For authors
  • Author fees
  • Peer review
  • Contacts

oa
crossref
анри


  Indexing

Scopus
doaj
elibrary

Address of the Editorial Office:

127055, Moscow, s/m 37

Correspondence address:

115054, Moscow, Zhukov passage, 19, fl. 2, room XI


Managing Editor:

+7 (495) 926-29-83

id@con-med.ru